crypto: add JWK support for ML-KEM and SLH-DSA key types

[panva]

• ML-KEM JWK in node:crypto and Web Cryptography
• SLH-DSA JWK in node:crypto

[nodejs-github-bot]

Review requested:

• @nodejs/crypto
• @nodejs/gyp

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 86.08696% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.68%. Comparing base (ed05549) to head (770f6d9).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/crypto/crypto_pqc.cc	82.79%	3 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #62706      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.69%   89.68%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         706      706              
  Lines      218127   218148      +21     
  Branches    41734    41748      +14     
==========================================
  Hits       195651   195651              
- Misses      14400    14408       +8     
- Partials     8076     8089      +13     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/internal/crypto/ml_kem.js	92.83% <100.00%> (+0.37%)	⬆️
lib/internal/crypto/webcrypto.js	96.58% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
src/crypto/crypto_keys.cc	73.59% <100.00%> (ø)
src/crypto/crypto_pqc.cc	82.79% <82.79%> (ø)

... and 26 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[tniessen]

Is my assumption correct that this is based on draft-ietf-jose-pqc-kem-05 / draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-11?

[panva]

@tniessen

correct, sort of. the AKP kty comes from dilithium, the jose-pqc-kem draft is not quite certain to be moving forward for JOSE but regardless of that specifically we did decide on the kty to use in the WG and based on the discussion with @twiss in Web Crypto space we will regardless of pqc-kem moving forward or not register the algs for JWK use so that we have a KEM-only JWK representation. that is pretty much set in stone since browsers have started their implementation at this point

WICG/webcrypto-modern-algos#64

[tniessen]

Nice work @panva!

[panva]

rebased because of a conflict in docs

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/72706/