compiler: Enhance detect_accesses

[FabioLuporini]

Test in PRO in the PR/branch with same name as this one

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.07692% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.45%. Comparing base (bd39274) to head (010ab52).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
devito/types/parallel.py	66.66%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2886      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.43%   83.45%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         248      248              
  Lines       51381    51404      +23     
  Branches     4431     4431              
==========================================
+ Hits        42871    42900      +29     
+ Misses       7757     7753       -4     
+ Partials      753      751       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest-gpu-aomp-amdgpuX	68.80% <73.07%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pytest-gpu-gcc-	78.04% <73.07%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pytest-gpu-icx-	77.67% <73.07%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
pytest-gpu-nvc-nvidiaX	69.33% <73.07%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mloubout]

This look very specific and seems like that's something retrieve_index should catch

[FabioLuporini]

the idea is that other objects can end up there, in the future, maybe...

as for retrieve_indexed catching it: disagree, it's not an implicit Indexed, it's rarther a logical representation of the base address of the TensorMove -- as an Indexed, for homogeneity